← Back to all comparisons
Side-by-side
Command R+ vs Llama 3.3 70B (Groq)
Cohere vs Groq — head-to-head specs and pricing.
Cohere
Command R+
Cohere's flagship RAG-optimized model.
Command R+ — optimized for retrieval-augmented generation with inline citations and tool use.
Groq
Llama 3.3 70B (Groq)
Llama at Groq speed.
Meta's Llama 3.3 70B served on Groq's LPUs — hundreds of tokens/sec.
| Spec | Command R+ | Llama 3.3 70B (Groq) |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Groq |
| Input cost / 1M tokens | $3.00 | $0.71 |
| Output cost / 1M tokens | $12.00 | $0.95 |
| Context window | 128,000 tokens | 128,000 tokens |
| Max output tokens | — | — |
| Streaming support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tool calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| Vision input | — | — |
| JSON mode | — | — |
| Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
Use both via OneAPIKey — one key, one bill
OneAPIKey aggregates Cohere, Groq, and 10 more providers behind a single API. Smart Routing automatically picks the best model per request — or you choose explicitly.