← Back to all comparisons
Side-by-side
Llama 3.3 70B (Groq) vs DeepSeek V3
Groq vs DeepSeek — head-to-head specs and pricing.
Groq
Llama 3.3 70B (Groq)
Llama at Groq speed.
Meta's Llama 3.3 70B served on Groq's LPUs — hundreds of tokens/sec.
DeepSeek
DeepSeek V3
Open-weights reasoning champion, rock-bottom pricing.
DeepSeek V3 — exceptionally low per-token pricing (10x cheaper than GPT-5). WARNING: Per DeepSeek ToS, prompts and responses may be used for model training and are processed on servers in China. Not recommended for sensitive workloads (healthcare, legal, financial) or EU data-residency requirements. Use for cost-sensitive consumer workloads where privacy is not a hard constraint.
| Spec | Llama 3.3 70B (Groq) | DeepSeek V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Groq | DeepSeek |
| Input cost / 1M tokens | $0.71 | $0.32 |
| Output cost / 1M tokens | $0.95 | $1.32 |
| Context window | 128,000 tokens | 128,000 tokens |
| Max output tokens | — | — |
| Streaming support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tool calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| Vision input | — | — |
| JSON mode | — | ✓ |
| Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
Use both via OneAPIKey — one key, one bill
OneAPIKey aggregates Groq, DeepSeek, and 10 more providers behind a single API. Smart Routing automatically picks the best model per request — or you choose explicitly.